Subject: Re: "about as interesting as Chekov in a "Star Trek" sequel"
Author: Benjamin Pavsner
Date: 16 May
Ref:

Interesting thesis. BTW: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU YAPPING ABOUT! Have a nice
day.
<user99`@nospam.nul> wrote in message
news:fugo24dak6go1hft35b7jb8kted2sme16v@4ax.com...
> It's sad, but let's just say it: This time out, the kids are about as
> interesting as Chekov in a "Star Trek" sequel. Susan (Anna Popplewell)
> is sullen and unpleasant, and Peter (William Moseley), the eldest, is
> pompous. Edmund (Skandar Keynes) was shady last time, but he's learned
> his lesson, so now he's boring. And Lucy (Georgie Henley) is no longer
> a little girl with a cute character face, but a pretty young lady on
> the brink of puberty. As such, she no longer effortlessly embodies
> spiritually gifted innocence.
>
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/14/DDIS10M921.DTL




"about as interesting as Chekov in a "Star Trek" …
15 Mayuser99`@nospam…
16 May|- Benjamin Pavsn…
17 May|  |- user99`@nospam…
19 May|  |  \ Daniel
19 May|  |     |- user99`@nospam…
20 May|  |     |  \ Daniel
19 May|  |     \ GeneK
4 Jun|  |        \ Duggy
18 May|  \ x@y.zzz
19 May|- rikp@aol.com
19 May|  |- Anim8rFSK
20 May|  |- Andrew
21 May|  |  \ Anim8rFSK
23 Aug|  \ Fozzi
21 May\ Quadibloc