>"David Johnston" <david@block.net> wrote in message
>news:cnc5145br553a63c93a9b55e1pgsqnma96@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:18:00 -0400, "80 Knight" <nospam@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> No, it wasn't. Hull plating would get hit and go down to "45%", then
>>>> "12%" and then it would be down. Physical material doesn't do that.
>>>
>>>If you take a piece of hard metal, and start shooting a gun at it, it will
>>>start to loose it's strength with each shot.
>>
>> Which is totally unlike what happened on Enterprise. Having hull
>> plating "down" did not mean the hull had a big hole in it. It was
>> really stupid.
>
>I will agree that it wasn't very well thought out, however I do remember
>seeing tiny pieces of the hull blow off whenever the Enterprise took a big
>hit after the plating went down.
>
Well naturally after the shields are down you start to take damage.