Subject: Re: Dawn
Author: David Johnston
Date: 26 Apr
Ref:

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:13:23 -0400, "80 Knight" <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

>"David Johnston" <david@block.net> wrote in message
>news:cnc5145br553a63c93a9b55e1pgsqnma96@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:18:00 -0400, "80 Knight" <nospam@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> No, it wasn't. Hull plating would get hit and go down to "45%", then
>>>> "12%" and then it would be down. Physical material doesn't do that.
>>>
>>>If you take a piece of hard metal, and start shooting a gun at it, it will
>>>start to loose it's strength with each shot.
>>
>> Which is totally unlike what happened on Enterprise. Having hull
>> plating "down" did not mean the hull had a big hole in it. It was
>> really stupid.
>
>I will agree that it wasn't very well thought out, however I do remember
>seeing tiny pieces of the hull blow off whenever the Enterprise took a big
>hit after the plating went down.
>

Well naturally after the shields are down you start to take damage.


Dawn
23 AprTim Bruening
23 Apr|- trigonometry19…
24 Apr|  \ Tim Bruening
24 Apr\ David Johnston
24 Apr   \ trigonometry19…
24 Apr      \ David Johnston
24 Apr         \ 80 Knight
25 Apr            |- trigonometry19…
25 Apr            |- David Johnston
25 Apr            |  |- 80 Knight
25 Apr            |  |  \ David Johnston
25 Apr            |  |     \ NeverMindWho
25 Apr            |  |        \ David Johnston
26 Apr            |  |           \ 80 Knight
26 Apr            |  |              \ David Johnston
26 Apr            |  |                 \ 80 Knight
26 Apr            |  |                    \ David Johnston
27 Apr            |  \ Rich Corinthia…
27 Apr            |     |- David Johnston
27 Apr            |     \ George Peatty
29 Apr            \ Tim Bruening
29 Apr               |- Kweeg
29 Apr               |  \ David Johnston
29 Apr               |     \ Kweeg
18 May               \ orionca@earthl…