Subject: Re: Dawn
Author: David Johnston
Date: 25 Apr
Ref:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:08:49 -0400, NeverMindWho
<NeverMindWho@NoWhere.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:17:02 GMT, David Johnston <david@block.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:39:55 -0400, "80 Knight" <nospam@nospam.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"David Johnston" <david@block.net> wrote in message
>>>news:v4u214hbp9579eb3ip023cb71h6t9j6c2c@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:11:38 -0400, "80 Knight" <nospam@nospam.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"David Johnston" <david@block.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:fip1141nrsvum7ltmfi8n9kcqmd439hgvo@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:19:36 -0700 (PDT), "trigonometry1972@gmail.com
>>>>>> |" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Apr 24, 9:18 am, David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:40:01 -0700, Tim Bruening
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <tsbru...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >In this episode, Trip is stranded on a moon with an alien named
>>>>>>>> >Zorgon.
>>>>>>>> >It gets up to 170 Centigrade on that moon in the day, so Trip and
>>>>>>>> >Zorgon
>>>>>>>> >must get themselves rescued before they bake. Even worse, the alien
>>>>>>>> >doesn't sweat, so he's more vulnerable to the heat than Trip. When
>>>>>>>> >Trip
>>>>>>>> >establishes contact with Voyager, why doesn't he ask Voyager to beam
>>>>>>>> >down a lot of water containers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Giving Enterprise a transporter at all was a mistake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>They should have dropped the transporters, I agree.
>>>>>>>And they should have had shields
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They did have shields. Worked exactly like the ones in the rest of
>>>>>> Star Trek. Just called them by another name.
>>>>>
>>>>>The NX-01 had "hull plating", not shields.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How was hull plating different from shields?
>>>
>>>I honestly don't know, but there was an episode where Trip and Reed were
>>>trying to create a stable force field.
>>
>>Yes, but they were idiots. Seriously the only difference between what
>>they were trying to create and what they had, is that they were trying
>>to create a forcefield at a distance.
>Hull plating was physical material

No, it wasn't. Hull plating would get hit and go down to "45%", then
"12%" and then it would be down. Physical material doesn't do that.


Dawn
23 AprTim Bruening
23 Apr|- trigonometry19…
24 Apr|  \ Tim Bruening
24 Apr\ David Johnston
24 Apr   \ trigonometry19…
24 Apr      \ David Johnston
24 Apr         \ 80 Knight
25 Apr            |- trigonometry19…
25 Apr            |- David Johnston
25 Apr            |  |- 80 Knight
25 Apr            |  |  \ David Johnston
25 Apr            |  |     \ NeverMindWho
25 Apr            |  |        \ David Johnston
26 Apr            |  |           \ 80 Knight
26 Apr            |  |              \ David Johnston
26 Apr            |  |                 \ 80 Knight
26 Apr            |  |                    \ David Johnston
27 Apr            |  \ Rich Corinthia…
27 Apr            |     |- David Johnston
27 Apr            |     \ George Peatty
29 Apr            \ Tim Bruening
29 Apr               |- Kweeg
29 Apr               |  \ David Johnston
29 Apr               |     \ Kweeg
18 May               \ orionca@earthl…